Skip to content
DEEN
Let’s talk

Digitalisation · Decision guide

The right software starts with the right questions.

Feature lists are easy to admire. What matters is whether a system makes your work easier. A practical method, from requirements to a tested data export.

By DLI Consulting 3 min read

The demon­stra­tion was impressive: a clean interface, clear reports and plenty of features. Only after imple­ment­ation does someone discover that an exception in the ordering process cannot be handled, a critical integ­ration costs extra and the master data still needs cleaning.

Start with a different question: Which specific part of our work should improve after imple­ment­ation? The method below provides a basis for your decision. It does not endorse any particular supplier.

01Describe the task before comparing suppliers

“We need a new CRM” already names a solution. “Enquiries get lost because nobody owns the next action” describes a problem. The two may be connected, but the first thing to fix might be a respons­ibility.

Describe one workflow from its trigger to its outcome. Who works on it? What inform­ation do they need? Where do people wait, enter data twice or correct errors? Ask the people doing the work every day, and record differ­ences between locations or customer groups.

02Separate essential criteria from preferences

An essential criterion determines whether a system is a viable option at all. A preference helps distin­guish viable options. Combining them can allow a high overall score to hide a critical gap.

  • Essential: The tested core process works, required data can be trans­ferred and necessary permis­sions can be configured.
  • Preference: A view saves clicks, a report is available out of the box or the team prefers the interface.
  • Later: Features without a specific current need or a person respons­ible for using them.

Record the evidence for each essential criterion: tested in practice, confirmed in writing or still unresolved. “The supplier says it is possible” offers different assurance from a successful test. Keep unanswered questions visible rather than silently treating them as resolved.

03Test the same cases with every candidate

Give each candidate the same small test brief. Use appro­priate test data and three cases: a normal trans­action, a common exception and a correction. Realistic fictional records are a good starting point where inform­ation is sensitive.

Illus­trative example, not a client case: A company tests an order with several delivery dates. It then changes an item and checks whether the change reaches warehouse planning and invoice prepar­ation. This workflow reveals whether the systems actually work together.

Let the future users work in the system themselves. Observe where they need explan­ations. Record any custom­isation and who will pay for it, implement it and maintain it. A well-prepared demon­stra­tion cannot replace this practical test.

04Examine total cost and the exit route

Compare proposals over the same period using the same assump­tions. Include imple­ment­ation, data cleaning, migration, integ­rations, training, internal time and ongoing support alongside licence fees. Show separately what changes if user numbers or data volumes grow.

Ask what happens when you switch. Which records, attach­ments and rela­tion­ships can you obtain, and in which formats? Who supports the export, what does it cost and how long do you have? Have a small export carried out. A CSV file alone does not demon­strate that the rela­tion­ships needed to run your business will survive.

For cloud services, Germany’s BSI provides further guidance on secure use across the contrac­tual lifecycle, including the end of the contract.1 Whether a particular service meets your privacy, security and contrac­tual require­ments needs a separate assessment.

05Record a decision that will still make sense later

Summarise the selection on one page. This makes the reasoning and the conditions of your decision clear.

  1. Objective: Which workflow should improve, and how?
  2. Comparison: Which options did you consider, including improving the existing system?
  3. Evidence: How did you test each essential criterion?
  4. Cost: Which assump­tions, internal effort and recurring costs are included?
  5. Unresolved issues: What must be settled before ordering or imple­ment­ation?
  6. Adoption: Who owns data, training, acceptance and operation?

The next step is a limited pilot with defined success criteria. Once everyday users can complete an entire workflow and the handover to operations is prepared, you have a stronger basis for a wider rollout.

Our IT and digit­alisa­tion consulting supports this prepar­ation. If standard software cannot meet the tested need, we compare it with a custom solution, including devel­opment and operating effort.

Further reading

  1. German Federal Office for Inform­ation Security: Secure Use of Cloud Services. This source supple­ments the guidance on secure cloud use; the selection method in this article is an editorial working framework by DLI Consulting.